The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was incubate (Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Nephilim (film)). Please feel free to create an appropriate redirect in place of the article. Material in the incubator can be used in other articles, provided there is proper attribution. Mkativerata (talk) 07:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nephilim (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film is in pre-production. WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 23:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — --Darkwind (talk) 04:55, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Incubate for a short while. As article's current sources indicate, the planned film IS getting coverage... enough to tickle at WP:GNG if not at WP:NFF. Incubation for continued work as more become available makes sense to me. While okay too with userfication instead if author wishes, my sense is that an incubation encourages a more collaborative effort. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:25, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am much in favor of an incubation. There was a lot of good sourced information and was tempted to merge it, but it had no where to go. BOVINEBOY2008 20:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep the nominator has appeared to withdraw their nomination, and the film's development (despite being in pre-production), is well-documented by third-party, independent sources. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 18:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the nominator has withdrawn their nomination by any stretch. Instead, they have suggested that it is incubated until it meets Wikipedia's criteria. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• As far as I can make out, production stalled in 2009 - are there any sources to suggest anything has happened since then? Ordinarily, I'd be in favour of a delete, but as there appears to be an earlier film that doesn't have its own article (and apparently some comic books), how about a restructure and move? This could either be to the director, or how about to Darkest Days (film), with the emphasis for the article being on the earlier film, and this film in a sequel section? The article is a bit all over the place anyway, and could use a tidyup! --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Although... A further look makes me ponder the notability of this and of the first film too. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Gulshan Grover is still talking of the film's release as of November 2010. Susan Kay Moses, the film's producer, still has the film listed as many of her projects. Emphasizing the earlier film Darkest Days (film) is an interesting thought.Faronshapter (talk • contribs) 01:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.