The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Randykitty (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nestor AI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marginally notable but promotional article created by now-blocked promotional accounts. The article has been created entirely by now-blocked accounts with only tweaks by neutral editors. It does not exactly qualify for G5 because the accounts were not blocked then.

If someone wants to rework this article within seven days, they can. A Soft Delete will permit a neutral editor to create a new article after this one is deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:15, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Soft Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 02:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft delete as per nomination. No prejudice against an unconnected editor creating a non-spammy version. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.