The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per G3, G7 and this discussion. --Oxymoron⁸³ 09:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neurotypical syndrome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

It appears to be an article about a disease, but no references are cited, and a "joke alert" image appears in the middle, making the article look like a joke. —_macy^{es: bot} 03:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Agree with assessment. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete as a practical joke and a hoax to boot. Graymornings_(talk) 04:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Could be a hoax. Could also be G3. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 06:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is a poorly made version of a rather NN in-joke in the Autism community. Fails notability and appears to be made while bored. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 07:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Of course this is a hoax. Why does it take so much effort to get garbage like this off WP?? --RandomHumanoid^(⇒) 07:47, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - it's intended to be a kind of soapboxing, I think. 'Neurotypical syndrome' equals 'neurologically normal', but it is written to describe the majority of people as having undesirable traits. - Richard Cavell (talk) 08:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete This is obviously a practical joke Pstanton 08:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.