The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NewGen PhotoLab

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a piece of software described as being under development for 2014 release. User:Trivialist previously placed a Prod notice with the rationale "Ad for unreleased software, no assertion of notability" but the notice was removed without comment or improvement by the WP:SPA author. So here we are at AfD, on the grounds that I too can find no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. A search turned up no significant RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 16:39, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage. No other indication of notability. --Michig (talk) 10:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.