The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser TSU 08:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable comic. No independent refs. I've found two things that come close to in-depth coverage: [1] is a user-contributed review (and thus not reliable) and [2] which appears to be a review of the technology platform used to deliver the content (which is not mentioned in the article), I'm also reasonable confident that most of the illustrations in the review aren't of this comic. So I'm seeing nothing in the way of in-depth coverage by independent third party sources, as required by the WP:GNG. PROD removed by WP:SPA creator. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]