The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Europeans[edit]

New Europeans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No inherent notability or independent sources for the organisation. A Google search only shows the organisation's own website and social media accounts. RaviC (talk) 18:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 07:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:19, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The group is mentioned a lot in reliable sources and is clearly active. But there is no significant coverage — there's always just a one-sentence description. That's not enough to pass the general notability guideline. Ralbegen (talk) 17:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The group is considerably active. Matt 190417 (talk) 07:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being active doesn't make an organisation notable. --RaviC (talk) 10:08, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete It seems like they could possibly be notable based on their activities, but I don't see the significant coverage in third-party reliable sources that would demonstrate it. The existing sources in the article are almost all from the organization itself, so they are basically press releases that don't help meet notability. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP We are a hugely influential civil rights movement fighting for the rights of EU citizens in the UK and Britons in Europe and a Europe of the citizens. there are numerous references to our work including in the Guardian, Financial times, BBC, The Parliament Magazine and elsewhere - we will update our Wikipedia site shortly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogercasale (talk • contribs) 22:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC) — Rogercasale (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

It's not "your" site. Wikipedia is not a web hosting service. Ifnord (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lacking significant coverage. Lorstaking (talk) 04:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Since the article's creation, I have twice sought to expand the article further. Maybe half of the sources I have used have been self-published or from affiliated organisations, but there is now sizeably more detail about the group's activities since the AfD was originally created. Matt 190417 (talk) 06:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The self-published sources do not count for notability. Sources that do count (such as the BBC) mention the subject in passing only. The BBC reference is mostly an infographic of election results. Ifnord (talk) 22:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.