The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Utopia[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not convinced this meets notability - the 'country' does not exist - it was a pipedream which never materialised - and probably never will now. Alligators1974 (talk) 00:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the sources seem to concur that while this was a scam and a non-existent micro-nation, its still a notable scam and a non-existent micro-nation. Things don't need to exist to be notable and once notable, they remain so (per WP:NOTTEMP). St★lwart¹¹¹ 00:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Stalwart111 and the rationale presented in the first AfD: the project doesn't have to be real to be notable, if it passes GNG, and this one pretty clearly does. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
withdraw the nomination I didn't realise it had already been nominated and survived. 'Insanity is doing the same thing again and again and expecting a different result' (Einstein) Alligators1974 (talk) 09:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.