The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 09:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Newfoundland and Labrador Tidy Towns Competition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) –(Viewlog · [1]):(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable competition, article is two sentences; not in any sense encyclopedically relevant.--NL19931993 (talk) 01:44, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nothing that satisfies WP:GNG in sourcing I can find. Even the main site is that was the sole non-independent "reference" of the article is dead. If there is anything that truly warrants mention, that can be crafted with sourced content at Newfoundland and Labrador without a need for a redirect given the dirth of use. Kingofaces43 (talk) 22:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, barely an assertion of any importance, no encyclopedic notability per WP:GNG. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.