The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article's subject is found to have been covered significantly by multiple reliable sources independent of the subject, and is therefore notable. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Kao Se Tseien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find evidence that this is a notable person. At best, this is someone who could have been (unsourced of course) the oldest Catholic priest in modern times (whatever "modern times" means) and the oldest ever person to have had a cataract operation (if that's really worth keep tracking of). Of the sources provided, one is a WP:ROUTINE obituary, the other was the GRG's excel spreadsheet of verified supercentenarian from which we should infer that his lack of listing means that he would have been somewhere on these things and three links which all seem dead links now. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I found an archived version of the Standard article here - it is Guinness who claims the oldest Catholic priest and oldest person to have a cataract operation so that helps. Still it's not clear to me that he's notable. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But what about being the oldest Catholic priest to get a cataract operation? Surely that's notable??? EEng 15:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. sst 00:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. sst 00:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I saw his picture and immediately decided to adopt him! Ill try to find more material on him over the next week so please don't delete.Notgoingtotellyou (talk) 23:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A priest who does not charge, how can such a big business, but on Notre Dame as his background. Effectiveness of evangelization is staggering: in his missionary career, took 50 young church members follow the call, successful young men, as a priest five successful about 20 nuns, really admire.
Author lives in only two nuns who have led successful, aided the ten young men and women on the road to call, it's hard. His amazing health and old age, with "seven" as his motto: first, don't smoke. Second, does not drink alcohol. Third, not angry. Four, do not worry. Five, not eating too much. Six, in constant motion. Seven, continuous prayer.
That's pretty much all that can be said about the subject -- he lived a long time and inspired about 50 guys to become priests. As for the Guiness record for being the oldest priest in modern times, I checked their site and couldn't find corroboration of it. However, the Vatican source tells us that he was (in February 2007) the oldest living priest. That same source tells us that the oldest priest in modern times was Alvaro Fernandez, who died in 1998. Fernandez doesn't have an article here, and neither should the subject. NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:16, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I understand, the Guinness World Records website is not a complete searchable database of every record they've ever recognised. The comparison with Alvaro Fernandez amounts to Wikipedia:Other stuff which isn't a good argument in AfD. Deryck C. 21:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.