The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 03:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Bognar[edit]

Nick Bognar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Musician that asserts notability, but does not seem to meet the guidelines at WP:MUSIC. There is one non-trivial mention, at [1], but this is the only thing I can find through a quick google search -- searching for the title of his album results in only 7 ghits, the above article, 3 self-published pages, and 3 unrelated. Article as-is seems to be written like an ad. Delete. Kesac (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete One article does not satisfy WIKIPEDIA:MUSIC. TheMile (talk) 01:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment per WP:CSD speedy deletion is only really appropriate for a musician that's either a blatant hoax or fails to assert notability, which is different from demonstrating it. I'd agree with the nominator that this is AfD rather than speedy material. ~ mazca ^talk 11:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: it's written like a curriculum vitae. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 04:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 09:53, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as failing to demonstrate notability. Seems to fail WP:MUSIC and WP:N. ~ mazca ^talk 11:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete as a clear vanity page for a musician who fails to demonstrate even minor notability. --Lenky (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.