The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Delano

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A bunch of minor awards do not meet PORNBIO and a bunch of interviews does not a secondary source make to meet GNG Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The Nightsmove award is notable enough. Clarification with PORNBIO should be reached within it's respective Wikiproject. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 22:46, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a failure of the general notability guidelines. It is time to scap the pornography guidelines. They have given up inordinate coverage of pornographic actors that has undermined the development of Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:23, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:23, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Keep. She meets WP:PORNBIO ("The person has won a well-known and significant industry award"). It seems like you have nominated most of the pornographic acting community on WP for AfD without reading WP:PORNBIO? Britishfinance (talk) 02:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets PORNBIO and GNG. Why "interviews does not a secondary source"?Guilherme Burn (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the awards are notable ones. "Best Latina Performer", "Best Ass" and "Best Butt" aren't significant awards. Fails both PORNBIO and GRG. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 16:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all the links to industry awards are not helping her notability because the awards are industry advertising tools. Her minor TV and magazine appearences don't meet WP:ENT. Most of the bio material is likely to be inaccurate because bio material is routinely and systekatically faked in the porn world for marketing. For example, prove she is bisexual... or is that part of the act? Legacypac (talk) 17:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.