The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G11. (non-admin closure) —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nischay Malhan[edit]

Nischay Malhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG . no reliable source for this person. Iamfarzan (talk) 02:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Iamfarzan (talk) 02:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As far as I'm aware there's no specific notability guidelines for YouTube personalities, outside of the GNG, and going by WP:WikiProject YouTube/Notability most AfDs about them have resulted in delete. I can't find anything on this person that would make them pass GNG either. Multiple trivial name drops, sure, but nothing that comes close to qualifying as significant coverage. Maybe someone can try to justify keeping the article by combining them, but I'm not that person. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete doing a quick google turns up nothing obvious other than social and fan cruft - fails WP:BIO fails WP:GNG. KylieTastic (talk) 09:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the article containing too much trivial and informal information. And most of the information in this article are copyrighted from here. Also, the article does not pass GNG, because I can't find any non-trivial sources. Toadboy123 (talk) 18:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Toadboy123, last comment; I'm not seeing non-trivial in-depth coverage either (probably some hybrid of WP:BIO/WP:WEB if I needed to point to specific topic-genre). Noting for the record that all substantive additions to the page appear to be from a single sock-drawer (accounts now blocked)--doesn't affect notability, but might indicate COI or similar spam. DMacks (talk) 18:49, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as copyvio (tagged article G12) apart from being non-notable failing GNG the creator is now CU blocked and Earwigs copyvio tool shows 3 major copied pieces and numerous other sentences JW 1961 ^Talk 19:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like its been deleted. So now this just needs to be closed. What's Earwigs copyvio tool? Adamant1 (talk) 01:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.