The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Nokia products. NW (Talk) 02:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia X6

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence for notability, and Wikipedia is not a mirror of every manufacturer's catalog of gadgets. Edison (talk) 02:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect - I agree with the nominator. However I believe a merge and redirect to List of Nokia products is more suitable in this case, as it is already established and edited on a daily bases (the list not the individual article). Or go with delete under crystal ball as the item is not released yetThanks. ShoesssS ^Talk 03:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment a redirect to list of Nokia products might be better than deleting per WP:CRYSTAL for a number of reasons.--^{The Legendary}_{Sky Attacker} 04:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/Merge No need to delete, plausible search term and relevent content can be placed in the list article. --Jayron32 06:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect Agree with above users, the important info currently on the page can be merged into the list. While we're on the topic, the Nokia X3 could also be redirected and merged into the list, per similar reasons. SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nowadays mobile phones((gadgets) are even more important/(passionate) than cars for young people. Google gives 5.5 million hists for search Nokia X6. It is notability.Jack007 (talk) 11:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This appears to be a page from a product catalog. The are 0 news hits and it's not due for release until next quarter. Internet hit counts are not evidence of notability; they can be affected by all sorts of thing that have nothing to do with being noteworthy. (See WP:GHITS.)--RDBury (talk) 04:25, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. I don't know why this always seems to happen. There was a war over the entry for the Nokia N85, which (at the time) was the only Nokia current product that didn't have an entry. It kept getting added and deleted. People use Wikipedia for precisely this kind of information, as well as for 'traditional' encyclopedia entries.PVarjak (talk) 21:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a valid reason to keep the article; please read WP:USEFUL.--RDBury (talk) 04:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.