The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:04, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Cain

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. He does have two SLAM Wrestling references in the article, but they are trivial mentions at best. Also doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE as he hasn't worked at the top level of his sport. Nikki♥311 03:55, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki♥311 03:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I can't find anything that can satisfy WP:GNG. (By the way, Nikki, WP:ATHLETE doesn't apply to scripted wrestling, that's under the jurisdiction of WP:ENTERTAINER which you have noted.) elektrik SHOOS 07:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not satisfy any relevant requirements. --Griseum (talk) 13:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG badly. Also fails WP:ATHLETE (scripting is irrelevant, Electrik, because of the athletic requirements in performing) and WP:ENTERTAINER just to butter both sides of the bread because both apply. Mal Case (talk) 06:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.