The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. both JohnCD (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Novofibre[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two pages created by one person who admitted to running two socks (as described at COIN discussion). Nominating both for deletion here. Articles are pure WP:Promotion. One user has suggested that the best solution to this is to move a sentence or two from the articles mentioning the OSSB product into Engineered wood, and to delete the rest. I agree. New Media Theorist (talk) 15:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Delete both and handle per nom. ukexpat (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. I believe that both articles were created in bad faith for the purpose of promoting a business. Deli nk (talk) 17:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete when a self-confessed socking PROMO SPA offers to allow their work to be deleted, who am I to say no? Brianhe (talk) 04:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I've added a one-line entry on the product at Oriented strand board#Related products. Oriented strand board is normally made from wood, but any long fiber will work, so straw or bagasse are sometimes used. John Nagle (talk) 05:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as although Books, News and highbeam all instantly found links, they were few and certainly not enough for better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 01:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question - snow close, anyone?--ukexpat (talk) 12:33, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.