The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nubian Message (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an African-American topics student newspaper at North Carolina State University. The only significant coverage of it I can find are in its own articles or those of The Technician, NCSU's mainstream student newspaper, which fails source independence. Aside from some sporadic citations to its articles and a single mention in an article about the NCSU NAACP chapter in The Crisis, there is no mention of it elsewhere. Thus it fails to meet WP:GNG. -Indy beetle (talk) 07:49, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - there is no notability guideline for specifically for newspapers, so all we have is WP:GNG and WP:NRV, "No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists: the evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition" - this paper could be notable if it is the first or only African-American student newspaper - the article certainly needs to be re-written to remove sensational editorial languge like, "students...remember vividly" and "The response...was nothing less remarkable." - but without "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" it qualifies for Delete - Epinoia (talk) 23:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.