- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nunt (book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability of this book is not established; only reference is the book's website, which links to reviews in local newspapers. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Probable delete He claims to have got reviews[1] but i can't find much online: some are dead links, some to publications of dubious authority, and references to mainstream newspapers are too vague. If there are a substantial amount of in-depth geographically-dispersed reviews by professional critics or academics, that would prove notability, but it's hard to tell from that link (some look more like passing mentions or possibly reviews of other work). It was nominated for an award from the Writers Guild of Alberta[2][3] and was one of 51 poetry books on the 2005 ReLit poetry longlist[4], but neither of those is sufficient to be notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:25, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.