The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is this company really notable? There are no sources to indicate that. FuFoFuEd (talk) 00:27, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. I'm having trouble even spotting an indication of importance WP:A7. Msnicki (talk) 01:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.