The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OWASP O2 Platform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the article's references possibly may imply notability, the article as it stands presents almost no NPOV information on the subject. Instead, it includes a number of external links with lead-ins such as "To gain a better understanding of what is O2? start with this presentation [...] and then read this presentation". It also includes a 'Try O2' section with a list of links to download locations. Removing all this content would render the article essentially empty, so I am nominating it for deletion. Aka042 (talk) 00:23, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Article has a certain advertisy tone to it, but it is not unsalvagable. The topic itself presents some refererences, but someone could clean this up to a reasonable article. Based on that, it should be kept and cleaned up rather than deleted. --Jayron32 00:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or weak merge into OWASP article. Not notable to warrant own article. References are blogs and are not from mainstream publications. Fails on NPOV and ADVERT. Mattg82 (talk) 01:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The sources presently in the article are all blogs. Surely the authors could have found two RS before writing the article. Miami33139 (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Reads like an advertisement. -- Scarpy (talk) 19:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.