The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Parvardigar Prayer. Content worth merging (if any) is still available in the article history. Randykitty (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

O Parvardigar (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since, everybody is free to remove a PROD, without addressing the reason(s) for in reliable and independent sources, as nomination, we're here to seek the view of the broader community on the issue.

I'm unable to find/locate any non-trivial coverage of the film demanded by our general notability guideline or by our subject-specific guideline.

It may be noted that all the sources that are currently in the article or were attempted by the creator to be inserted in the article fails one of our core guidelines about the reliability of self-published-sources and does not lend any to notability. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Pinging Hoverfish, as a co-participant in many of the discussions, on the same locus.~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion should actually be listed on the India WikiProject page here and the WikiProject Film talk page, here. This is a film. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:08, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-ntable short film, no significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NFILM. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Significant work of Meher Baba. Notable article please consider (WP:INDAFD)). Accesscrawl (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Read WP:AADD.And, it's expected that since both the nominator (me) and the other !voter (GSS) are Indian, we ought be able to exploit Indian sources...~ Winged Blades^Godric 15:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete There has been no presentation of any 3rd party sources covering this work at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, the Pete Townshend connection to the film constitutes a source, and this film is listed on the Townshend template as one of three DVD's attributed to the singer/songwriter. Randy Kryn (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Source, please? And, I've removed this article from Pete's discography template since the inclusion makes precisely zero sense.Also, see about our prohibition on circular referencing.∯WBG^converse 01:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • A source that the film exists and is prominent? Already on the page. I know it is unhelpful to your attempt to remove this article from Wikipedia that Pete Townshend, a notable and prominent singer-songwriter, is heavily involved. I've reverted your edit on the Townshend template, and now I see that you've put a notability and other tags on Townshend's album of the same name. Yes, Pete Townshend is heavily involved, but removing mention of that from pages and templates on Townshend on an encyclopedia is not the way to precede. Randy Kryn (talk) 08:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • No body is doubting the existence of the film.We are doubting it's prominence, in that it has failed to secure any major reviews/independent coverage.Best,∯WBG^converse 08:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect to Parvardigar Prayer. There is a reliable source attesting to the existence of the film and Townshend's participation in it in the book Who Are You: The Life Of Pete Townshend, p, 318. Omnibus Press. However, that's not enough for a stand-alone article. Voceditenore (talk) 09:32, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • A good source, and more than a trivial mention. This is actually enough to establish the notability of this article. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:41, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Although I provided it, in my view, that source does not establish sufficient notability for a stand-alone article. Townshend is very notable, but that does not make any and every entity with which he has been associated de facto notable if there is not sufficient in-depth coverage of the entity itself. Note that a merge would not preclude adding the piped redirect to Template:Pete Townshend. Voceditenore (talk) 09:57, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's little properly-sourced stuff to merge.Basically, the existence is demonstrated.A redirect, at best.∯WBG^converse 09:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.