The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 10:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OfficeMA Timesheet

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:40, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Couldn't find a mention in anything resembling a WP:RS. Vrac (talk) 02:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. Only ref provided is a single-author blog, and a search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.