The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I am not implementing the suggestions below, as I have little knowledge in the area. lifebaka++ 01:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oncofertility[edit]

Oncofertility (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Neologism, content relevant (without all the namedropping) but best merged with chemotherapy (the main cause of fertility loss in cancer treatment). JFW | T@lk 23:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename to Oncofertility consortium, This group has clear notability per PMID 18080669 and review, review, review, news story, news story and news story. However the term is not yet used widely, so the field itself is not yet separate from its originating organizaion. Tim Vickers (talk) 02:05, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename and redirect, per the wide coverage shown by Tim. But keep the redirect as a likely search term. --Reinoutr (talk) 17:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It seems to be a notable interdisciplinary field worthy of a separate article, not just a neologism.--Pink Bull (talk) 00:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that almost all of the papers using this term were published in a single 2007 issue of Cancer Treatment and Research. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.