The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 04:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oren Fuerst

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have no reason to believe that this person is notable. The article, now trimmed, was a puff piece with a likely COI. No references to reliable sources were removed from the article since none were provided; I couldn't find any either. Drmies (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A WP:BLP with no independent references. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 00:06, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Some decent cites on GS but not enough yet. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:55, 15 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. I could only find these two pieces [1] [2], which fall very short of being significant coverage - frankie (talk) 01:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.