- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. j⚛e deckertalk 02:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oscar Martinez (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly made article about a non-notable person. I'm nominating at AfD
as the "links" seem to be some sort of general citation, and to clear up any doubts about the subject's notability. It may also be worth noting, that while "Oscar Martinez" is the name of a character on the US version of "The Office", this person probably exists. Novato 123chess456 (talk) 20:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep pending a verifiable reference or two. I've had some trouble finding enough references to provide proper sourcing for an article (Spanish-language sources may have more to offer), but there's a plethora of links describing him as a "legend" in Tejano music. As an inductee of two different Tejano music Halls of Fame (ref to one of them here) he should easily pass WP:MUSBIO point 7 as "one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style". The article needs a lot of work, but notability should not be a problem. --Finngall talk 21:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, if somebody can provide a reliable source about Martinez, I will withdraw my nomination. Novato 123chess456 (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.