The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Osiris Entertainment

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'd previously PRODed this, but the PROD has since been removed by an IP without any comment. My argument was that the company isn't notable. The sources on the article are all IMDb links, which cannot show notability, and a search brings up no sources that could establish notability for the company as a whole. Of the films linked in the article, most do not have an article and one was recently deleted for a lack of notability. One of the films (Listen to Your Heart (film)) does seem to have some notability (although it needs serious cleanup), but the other (Eavesdrop (film)) is decidedly non-notable and one that I'll be listing for deletion as well. Given that their productions have been predominantly non-notable and they have received no direct coverage themselves, I don't see where this passes notability guidelines per WP:CORP. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've opened up an AfD for Eavesdrop, but I also ended up having to redirect Listen to Your Heart to its director's page. Despite the amount of awards it claimed to have won, none are notable enough to really count towards notability and there was a very distinct lack of sources for that film. (I found about 2-3 sources, none of which were enough to argue for inclusion for its own entry.) This is something to take into consideration when arguing for or against notability for the company. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:14, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 23:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.