The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Our Culture Records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label, no notable artists, absolutely no obvious coverage in reliable sources anywhere. Couldn't find a thing. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom, I could find no reliable references. No notable artists signed. No length of operation. No indication the label has any influence on musical landscape. Fails WP:GNG and WP:V, and could not be considered "one of the more important indie labels" according to WP:NMUSIC. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:59, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I tend to be pretty lenient on record-label articles, but this one pretty clearly has no notable artists or releases. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see the reason for deleting a record label. The article has been on wikipedia for quite a while. Surely it's notability is enough to be on Wikipedia. It's been seen by many admins before and never flagged up. I just think it's non-sense to delete it now. The label is also active in the worldwide electronic music scene promoting and releasing music. User:Vanmodhe 10:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is a newly created label and as it is record labels almost never get significant and notable coverage and that seems to be the case here. Multiple searches at News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary found nothing. SwisterTwister talk 20:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.