The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. None but the nominator opined in favor of deletion (or merger). Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 00:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC) I struck through the above after Verbal, the nominator, brought to my attention that it's incorrect to state that only the nominator favored merger. So, I will simply indicate that that no one except the nominator favored deletion, and that while a plurality including the nom favored merger, the overall rough consensus was to keep. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 11:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of life extension (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant due to Index of life extension-related articles and List of life extension-related topics (should redirect here perhaps), not to mention Life extension categories and the Life extension article itself. A WP:CFORK which is simply a poor duplicate - the Life extension article with all the information removed. Verbal chat 20:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - part of the WP:OOK and definitely a keeper. Note that List of life extension-related topics is a redirect to Index of life extension-related articles. Wikipedia has a set of indexes and a set of outlines. They provide alternate means of navigation: indexes are linear alphabetized lists, outlines are lists structured by subject. The synergistic relationship between lists (of which outlines are a type) and categories is explained at WP:CLN. The Transhumanist 21:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• keep Outlines appear to serve a different function than the lists and are therefore not redundant. Artw (talk) 23:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please explain this function. Thanks, Verbal chat 20:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Here you go: Wikipedia:Outlines. Artw (talk) 23:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep A sensible aid to navigation between our numerous articles. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Template:Life extension, as insufficient in scope to warrant a separate outline. (I say this as a strong supporter of the Outline project in general. Just not in this particular case.) -- Quiddity (talk) 21:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would support a merge to the template. Verbal chat 21:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.