The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  15:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Norton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An earlier incarnation of this article was AfD'd just over 12 months ago with the general consensus being that it was too soon for this young DJ to pass notability standards. I submit that it may well still be too soon. While there are plenty of links, these are to the tracks themselves, rather than to the depth and breadth of coverage required by NMUSIC/GNG. He's still very much an up-and-comer, but what I can see suggests he's not quite there yet. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- WP:TOOSOON. One popular remix is not sufficient for encyclopedia notability. No albums and no charting singles. Articles is sourced almost exclusively to primary sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.