The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford University Austro-Hungarian Society[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:J31ox (creator, WP:SPA) with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like spam. PS. Ping User:Superbeecat who nominated it for speedy before my prod. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 19:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as simply a business listing and there's absolutely no established independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 19:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it's pure online promotion and not notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Three are occasional exceptions, but undergraduate societies are generally NN. I see no exception here. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This looks like a non notable student club to me. Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.