The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Swatjester (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) as CSD A7. — TKD::Talk 16:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PAWNGAME[edit]

PAWNGAME (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non notable online game. Hasn't been covered by any independent reliable sources, and the search result only reveals forum entries and directory pages. Doesn't satisfy WP:WEB. Alasdair 14:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: NN with no outside sources. - Rjd0060 14:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails the notability guidelines for websites becuase of no outside sources.NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 14:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB and WP:N. Only related hits on Google are, as nom said, not reliable sources. The Wikipedist 18:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB. This article have been created and delete multiple times before; no reliable sources are created in this period of time.Rockvee 21:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would a Speedy (G4) + Salt be in order then? Arakunem 22:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. Check the deletion record for detail. This subject have been created under different titles as Pawngame, Pawn Game, Pawn(MMO), may be more.Rockvee 00:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No sources that I can find anywhere. Came across this article while on RC patrol, and I can't tell what's vandalism and what's factual... Arakunem 22:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete A7 IMO, but may as well let the AfD run — iridescent (talk to me!) 22:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete During vandalism patrol, I found this article. It's non notable, and we'd need about four editors working 24/7 to keep it vandal free. Agree with Arakunem's point, I can't figure out what is what either. Puchiko 23:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable and lack of reliable sources -- AngelOfSadness talk 23:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:WEB, WP:N, and possible WP:COI. Note the page created by what may be a single purpose account, see [here. Most of the other editors (esp. IPs) seem to be SPAs - although their purpose seems to be more vandalism than creating an article about a non-notable game. --Cheeser1 23:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, this fits A7 like that slipper fit Cinderella. hbdragon88 23:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Snowball delete for obvious reasons. <eleland/talkedits> 23:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.