The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PNGlish[edit]

PNGlish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Accidentally used CSD A7, and got declined because the article is about software. I still think this page should be deleted because the subject does not seem to be notable, and in any case, it is apparently in the early stages of development. Probably because of this, there are no references anywhere on the internet about this software. J.delanoy^gabsanalyze 15:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. If A7 extended to software I'd certainly have deleted this as a speedy. No assertion of notability, none found on search. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 15:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Fails notability, not sourced and biased. AVand^talk_contribs 15:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all the above Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a delightful example of why A7 might be worth extending to software. No evidence or assertion of notability. ~ mazca ^talk 18:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No evidence of any third-party reliable sources. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 21:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.