The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 00:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PSPSex.Net[edit]

Article recreated and speedily deleted several times. I want a clarification on the speediness of this, as well as a query for a possible salting of this article.

Basically, the article is a not-notable porn site. It's in the top 100,000 Websites (according to Alexa), not high enough to truly be notable. It has gotten mentioned in a Sony Press release once, but that is it. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 05:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes but it also signed a deal with a major canadian cellular network! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bergsteinlife (talk • contribs)

Delete and salt I've seen it three times already, I think. Possibly also spam block the account. §FreeRangeFrog 05:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm trying to encourage the user towards more constructive editing[1]. See also PSPSex.net. Bovlb (talk) 05:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt both PSPSex.net and PSPSex.Net per nom. And whatever else this user tries to create in the future to get around the salts. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and add a generous amount of salt—I've had enough spam in my belly as-is. I would also consider action against the user. MuZemike 08:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 08:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt per WP:SNOW.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 12:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete--Peephole (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They where supposed to provide videos for telus but people got mad and telus scrapped the mobile porn. I guess westnet went with them instead. Thats notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.156.88 (talk) 11:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable spam. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 20:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.