The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Part Five of the Fundamental Statute of the Kingdom of Albania[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article violates WP:NOTREPOSITORY. Wikipedia is not a reference guide or depository for legal documents. The article can be about the Statute, but not a literal showing of the statute. This article belongs on Wikisource, not Wikipedia. An alternate proposal would be to redirect the article to Fundamental Statute of the Kingdom of Albania. White Shadows ^{Let’s Talk} 01:58, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Fundamental Statute. Having the parts of the statute split into different articles is not only superfluous, it makes it difficult to parse information quickly. In the United States Constitution article, there is information about each article of the constitution. Since each part of the fundamental statute doesn't seem to have enough information to constitute its own article, they can all be merged into the mother page. Henry ^TALK 02:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 04:57, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's not much to merge to Fundamental Statute of the Kingdom of Albania - well - very small part of the lede (chapter title). And we would not want a redirect (probably).Icewhiz (talk) 10:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The content of the article is too insubstantial for a merge, and the title of the article is too specific for a redirect to be useful. Newslinger (talk) 04:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.