User:1997kB/Userpage/Modules/File

Hello, 1997kB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ! :)

Ritu qgk (talk) 13:20, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You added several categories to Mukta Moni, none of which are people categories. The subject has a disease or condition, the subject is not the disease itself. Similarly, we would not categorize movie stars in Category:Films. See more at Wikipedia:Categorization of people, and WP:Biographies of living persons. --Animalparty! (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will take care of that in future and thanks for your guidance. – 1997kB 00:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this.[1] It's always worth elaborating on these kinds of reports, because not being from India I had no idea what this acronym stood for. Thanks again – filelakeshoe (t / c)  14:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 1997kB. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS FOR YOUR HELP I HAVE A QUESTION I WANNA ASK YOU (Redranger007 (talk) 05:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

@Redranger007: Yes please! How can I help you? – 1997kB 05:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HEY bud sorry im 2 days late KB But i was wondering if you had a email address.. I have a article that its all good to post. it passes all wikipedia guidelines but just needs to probly needs to be posted! Thanks soo much (Redranger007 (talk) 06:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

@Redranger007: I can't share email address, but if you wants to create an article on Wikipedia, you can do it yourself. Just create article in your Your sandbox and nominate it for review. If article is according to Wikipedia guidelines, It will be accepted. If you still have any doubt about the process, feel free to ask. Thanks! – 1997kB 07:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WORD ITS THAT EASY LOL I THOUGH THAT WOULD TAKE FOREVER ID RATHER POST STRAIGHT TO MAINSPACE! (Redranger007 (talk) 07:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)) THANKS BUD[reply]

Cheers!🍻 – 1997kB 10:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Alex Shih^Talk 15:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clerking WP:CHU/S! Here's a kitten you can snuggle up with.

—k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, automatic rollback should not be used on good faith edits, as it was here. Another user added the entry, presumably in good faith, and I moved it and linked it. Even if you disagree that Internet Day celebrated in South America and elsewhere does not merit a place on that list article, such an edit should not be reverted with the rollback tool. Thank you. —BillC ^talk 18:08, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BillC: Thanks for informing. It always good to know our mistakes, so that we can prevent them in future, but as per Internet Day's Wikipedia article Internet Day is celebrated on May 17 in South America, that's why I rollbacked it. Thanks Again! – 1997kB 02:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What was the point of this edit? The bot already posted that message. All it does is make the renamer's job a little more difficult by having to read multiples of the same message. Nihlus 20:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I dont know what to do with my name change, and i was emailed to follow up with you. I don’t know if this is what I’m supposed to do. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Widad shafakoj (talk • contribs) 20:12, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nihlus: Ok, I'll take care of that in future. Thanks! @Widad shafakoj: Your requested username already exist on Wikipedia, although that username has made no edits so its available for usurpation, but for that you need to request at Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations and if you do not want the username you requested, you can as for a new one at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thanks! – 1997kB 02:37, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am sorry I don’t understand what I need to do in order to simply change the capital letter in my surname! I have requested so many times and I don’t know if my requests are going through! Thanks a lot, I need someone’s help. Widad shafakoj (talk) 02:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Widad shafakoj: Your requested username already exist on Wikipedia, although that username has made no edits so its available for usurpation, but for that you need to request at Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations and if you do not want the username you requested, you can as for a new one at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thanks! – 1997kB 02:38, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1997kB: I keep trying to request but it keeps telling me the name is in use and is unavailable, so I am unable to request it on Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations , but since the username I want (which is same as the one i have now except for the capital surname) has made no edits, and is available for usurpation, why can’t I change it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Widad shafakoj (talk • contribs) 02:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Widad shafakoj: Mediawiki software does not thinks in that way. 'Wadad Shafakoj' and 'Wadad shafakoj' are two different username for that software and we know that you wants to capitalize your surname's first letter. Now it seems that you want username 'Wadad Shafakoj' please follow up at at your username usurp request entry on Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations. Thanks! – 1997kB 02:51, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you reverted the edits made to Sanskrit (largely by IP users, which I just copy-edited) using the edit summary, "Stable one". Could you please explain your reasoning for this? They seemed like legitimate edits to me, and the new image looked much tidier than the barely legible one that you reverted to. You even reverted the capital S that I placed at the start of saṃskṛtam at the top of the infobox. I'm confused as to why you did this. Cheers. nagualdesign 13:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nagualdesign: Hi, thanks for contacting, First of all I was only removing its country status, because it is not official language in India and to do that there were two options, First I accept all those edits (as page is protected) and then remove the wrong one and second remove the all edits and add back the correct ones (as I did) but I was real busy in life and took this much time. Sorry for that. Thanks again! #1997kB 14:09, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I was just genuinely curious as I applied for permission to be a pending changes reviewer earlier, and the pending edits to Sanskrit looked fine to me. When you reverted I thought perhaps I should leave reviewing to somebody else! It's good to know that I wasn't totally wrong. And thank you for reverting the revert. Regards, nagualdesign 15:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1997kB. I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 07:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Insertcleverphrasehere: I am very glad to the invitation, but as you can see on my userpage, I am super busy until 20 December. Can I join page reviewing after 20 Dec.? Thanks again for invitation. #1997kB 04:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! Any time is good. You can also request the user right now and then use it when you have more time available. Reviewers are not obligated to start using the tools immediately. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 20:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 1997kB. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 10:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Skdwived (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gita Arti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi 1997kB, can you please help on like how I can merge this page Draft:Gita Arti with Gita Jayanti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skdwived (talk • contribs) 16:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Skdwived: Hi, Thanks for contacting! As I found that Gita Arti is an prayer, which is followed at Gita Jayanti, so you can create a subheading on article Gita Jayanti as the article itself needed more context related to it. I could help you with merging but right now I'm little busy, so you have to do it yourself. Any concerns regarding this feel free to ask. Thanks. #1997kB 17:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1997kB: Hi, I have just merged the content, please check, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skdwived (talk • contribs) 04:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Skdwived: Hi, yeah it looks good now! #1997kB 09:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1997kB: Thank you for the changes on the page, I just want to mention one thing which seems like a perfect timing, as the day when you have reviewed the source draft & suggested a merge on the destination page i.e. Gita Jayanti was the same date of Gita Jayanti celebration this year. Thank you again, God bless.Skdwived (talk) 16:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The picture I posted none of them looked european those vidoes were from the capital side (srinagar) and an indian interviewer you think all were pure bred kashmiris their are gujjars and indian uslim migrants in srinagar aswell. This is how an average looks like. An average Kashmiri looks similar to an average Pashtun or persian. We're dardic not Indic or south asian looking. YT1, YT2, YT3 But okay I'll remove the two euro looking kashmiris in the collage but if you want to show kashmiris as an south asian looking race thats offensive. Read the physical characteristics on the same page Kashmiris and kashmiri pandits don't look like the average kashmiri muslim don't show their pictures.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dardic warrior (talk • contribs) 13:03 30 November, 2017 (UTC)

@Dardic warrior: Hi, I think you are confused that I warned you about adding image on article Kashmiris, well that's not what you thinking about, I placed warning on your talk page regarding these edits in which you provided a link as reference which was not working. If you still have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact! Thanks. #1997kB 13:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<font color="#e74c3c">#</font><b>[[User:1997kB|<font color="#2ECC71">1997</font>]][[User talk:1997kB|<font color="#F1C40F">kB</font>]]</b>: #1997kB

to

<span style="color: #e74c3c;">#</span><b>[[User:1997kB|<span style="color: #2ECC71;">1997</span>]][[User talk:1997kB|<span style="color: #F1C40F;">kB</span>]]</b>: #1997kB

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 23:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomalocaris: Thanks you for the suggestion! #1997kB 03:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of it! —Anomalocaris (talk) 04:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1997kB. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

Just wanted to let you know that an article that you accepted through AFCH is up for deletion.

Thanks, TJH2018talk 18:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sega, Kaithal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hisar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 1997kB, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
• Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

• If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: ((subst:NPR invite)). Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

• A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
• Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

• ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
• The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello 1997kB. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gauri Kulkarni, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: playing the lead role in a notable film indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 07:56, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the G12, so you might want to either re-open the AFD or remove the template from the article. Cheers, Primefac (talk) 15:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Blameme21 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Osmond Theodore Fairclough (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello can you tell me what specifically was copyrighted so I can fix it. The information I produced is very general and well known about this hisotical figure. Please let me know. Thank you! Blameme21 (talk) 01:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Blameme21: Hi, As copy-paste is strictly prohibited and taken very seriously, So whenever we found a copyright infringement we nominate it for deletion, but in your draft there is ~40% copy paste as you can see here. So please remove this content and also please see WP:MOS. Thanks! ─ 1997kB 02:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Odorrana arunachalensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Zekelayla (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ron Zwanziger (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't see exactly why this submission was rejected. It included reference from notable sources including the Boston Globe article, which Zwanziger was a primary subject of. He was also e.g. received a full profile in the Boston Business Journal https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2008/08/11/story3.html. The wikipedia article Alere already calls for him to have an article.

Zekelayla (talk) 18:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Zekelayla: here is the reason, that why I rejected this draft. I bet you didn't read that properly, because that's why you are here. But to clarify further let me tell you that the references you provided when i rejected the draft were just mentions and talking about 'buy and sell', 'resign from company', none of the sources were actually talking about subject in depth and which is necessary for an Wikipedia article. I think you got me what I want to say and please see WP:RS, WP:BLP. If you still have any doubts feel free to ask. Thanks! ─ 1997kB 04:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. this was my first new article. Another editor cleaned it up nicely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zekelayla (talk • contribs) 08:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating India at the 2017 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games, 1997kB!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 1997kB, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

• The total number of reviews completed for the month.
• The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, I'm Atsme. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, She for Keeps, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

^{Atsme📞📧} 22:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 1997kB - it is my understanding that when an article has issues that trigger an AfD, we remove the "reviewed" checkmark so it won't be indexed. If it survives AfD, it will be up for review again. Is that your understanding? ^{Atsme📞📧} 22:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Atsme: I think if a article survived AfD then why it need to review? I mean so many editor give their views in AfD and I don't think that it needs to be reviewed again and also curation tool automatically mark reviewed when we AfD an article, so it looks like tool is also designed in way that AfDed article don't need to review again. Thanks. ─ 1997kB 11:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had it all backwards 1997kB - my apologies. I conflated the process with another issue. I'm blaming the many Holiday distractions.  Self-whale... for when a trout just isn't enough ^{Atsme📞📧} 14:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]