The result was delete. Keep votes are admittedly "weak", and several editors agree that the sources listed are not sufficiently independent or detailed to confirm notability. Taking this into consideration, I see consensus as leaning towards delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Behavioral-health-care facility lacking third-party published coverage as evidence for notability (has been tagged for notability since May 2009). Additionally, page is the continuing focus of "editing attention" from users committed to either (1) disparaging the organization or (2) promoting it. I suggest deletion as a non-notable topic, and further point out that Wikipedia does not provide a platform for carrying on battles about non-notable topics. Orlady (talk) 18:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]