The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus due to insufficient participation. There is therefore no prejudice against speedy renomination. Stifle (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patrickjmt[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Educational website. Despite the mentions in the local paper and an education website, I don't think this meets the notability standards of WP:WEB. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:WEB as well as WP:SOURCES Bluefist ^talk 04:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that basically what the wiki pages for Sal Khan and Khan Academy boil down to, except that he's received more attention since he's a little more broad in what he puts up online? Given, of course, he's won more awards than PatrickJMT (I'm not sure whether he's won any), but the WP:WEB states that anything besides trivial coverage counts (which I'm fairly sure that PatrickJMT has gotten). Leonnatus (talk) 04:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I still haven't found other any news article (I could have sworn a mayor of Austin did something about Patrick...)Leonnatus (talk) 05:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC) Scratch that: http://www.avozdaserra.com.br/noticiaslight.php?noticia=1286[reply]

Is this notable enough? Leonnatus (talk) 05:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Along with the newspaper coverage and a good many online references, his videos have received 14 million views. I'd say 14 million views makes him significant. Trilemma (talk) 19:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Please keep this listing up. This guy is creating some of the absolute best (and free) math educational content on the net. He is the person I use on a daily basis for help with math. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.139.50 (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This guy should have a Wikipedia page. Here are some notable news articles that mention him: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ccap/2014/09/16/moocs-finishing-is-not-the-important-part/#7fd6446d5ebc http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/02/education/edlife/advice-for-new-students-from-those-who-know-old-students.html?_r=0 http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/youtube-math-star-patrickjmt-explains-math-and-science-concept-behind-yamie-chess-stem-education-aid-to-parents-and-teachers-244733751.html http://easterneronline.com/37469/opinion/math-lab-contributes-to-departments-bad-reputation/ . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.139.50 (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. from Template:Relist --> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitetiger24601 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.