- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Paul Chabot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. First nomination ended with no consensus, but the arguments for keep are not in line with notability guidelines or unconvincing in general. Kurykh (talk) 08:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article is about a prominent-enough political activist, if nothing else. Notability is not inherited, so "Conservative Move" alone cannot qualify him, but there's enough notability about Chabot himself out there, in relation mostly to the organization, that makes him eligible as a subject for a Wikipedia article, e.g. here, here, or here. Chabot seems to have had other notable, political activities, as well, that satisfy WP:NPOL. -The Gnome (talk) 10:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- Clear case. Meets GNG. See e.g. Press-Enterprise profile, Los Angeles Times profile, McKinney Courier-Gazette interview, The Sun, Texas Monthly, and so on. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 12:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per both arguments above. -- Anatoliatheo (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 16:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 16:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.