The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Penelope Pussycat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references. Fails WP:GNG. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Pepé Le Pew. Redirects are cheap. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:11, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Did you not see the 2 references at the bottom of the article? I added the "reflist" template so that they show up closer to the top. So, your "no references" rationale fails. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, I would withdraw my nomination if I could. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From what I've heard you can comment I withdraw at the bottom of the AfD and someone will come around eventually to close it. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I added several references to the article. The character is discussed quite a bit in the 1998 book Reading the Rabbit: Explorations in Warner Bros. Animation, in the chapter "Ah Love! Zee Grand Illusion! Pepé Le Pew, Narcissism and Cats in the Casbah". — Toughpigs (talk) 23:50, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep given nominator's desire to withdraw, the presence of sources, and the new adds from Toughpigs. -2pou (talk) 02:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Agreed. Now it is clearly notable. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.