The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peppermint Creeps[edit]

Peppermint Creeps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a band, which is not an improvement in either substance or sourcing over the version that got deleted in 2016. There still isn't any notability claim being made here that would pass WP:NMUSIC, and there still aren't nearly enough reliable sources being cited — six of the seven footnotes here are to primary sources, such as discogs.com and last.fm, that are not support for notability at all, and the only one that's sort of a semi-reliable source is just reporting the drummer's death, not substantive coverage about the band doing band things, so it is not enough to get them over WP:GNG all by itself as the only non-terrible source in play. As always, bands are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because discogs and last.fm technically verify that they existed — to get a Wikipedia article, a band has to show that it has received a GNG-satisfying volume of reliable source coverage in real media, in the context of having achieved something that passes WP:NMUSIC, but there's still nothing here which satisfies either part of that equation at all. Bearcat (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete one of the better-written noms I’ve seen in a long while. Nothing else needs to be said. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails SIGCOV and GNG. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.