The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Perl#Perl golf. Nom should've been WP:BOLD and redirected themselves. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 04:02, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perl Golf Apocalypse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; I can't find any reliable sources covering this competition. Esquivalience ^t 01:07, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Perl#Perl golf. This is a minor one-time event in the history of Perl. I think it was covered briefly in The Perl Journal and mentioned in passing at Wired. There are secondary non-reliable sources such as Perl timeline. But I could not find multiple in-depth reliable sources for this competition. The one sentence mention in Perl#Perl golf seems appropriate weight and Perl Golf Apocalypse seems like a plausible search term, so a redirect would be reasonable. --Mark viking (talk) 14:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Perl#Perl golf as nominator (rationale as per above). Esquivalience ^t 05:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.