The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Cugno

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Does not otherwise meet WP:GNG. No coverage in independent, reliable sources found on before search. Jack Frost (talk) 06:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet notability guidelines for voice actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. This is not an improvement over the version that was previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Cugno — in fact, it's significantly worse, containing even less substance and not adding any new sources that actually count as reliable or notability-assisting ones. (And just as a reminder, I was actually the original creator of the first article about him, so I'm in no way biased against him — but as our sourcing and notability standards tightened up over the years, I found that I couldn't locate the depth of reliable source coverage required to actually make an article about him sustainable under our inclusion and referencing requirements.) Voice actors do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because they exist, or because their existence can technically be "referenced" to IMDB-like databases — they get articles only if and when they've received enough media coverage to properly support an article. Bearcat (talk) 20:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't like adding "me too" votes, but there really isn't anything I can add to Bearcat's excellent commentary above. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.