The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Fenton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Had PRODded and a user improved it somewhat and removed the prod however the linked reference proves an album existed but no evidence that it or anything else by the artist charted. So not sure he passes WP:MUSIC. Doesn't seem to be an appropriate merge to the band since he was only with them briefly. Thoughts? StarM 12:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 12:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete claim to notability is a very brief (5 month) stint playing with Siouxsie & the Banshees before they were a notable band. While that's kind of cool, it isn't enough to pass WP:MUSIC. At best he might be a plausible redirect to the band's page, but since he's just a footnote in their long careeer even that might be too generous. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. OlYeller^Talktome 19:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Siouxsie & the Banshees. Redirects are cheap Duffbeerforme (talk) 05:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: insufficiently notable on his own. Appears to have done nothing of note past the Banshees. JamesBurns (talk) 09:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.