The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peter List

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested A7 speedy recreated. Sources appear to indicate existence but not substative proof to address notability. Tawker (talk) 23:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:BIO. It was earlier speedied by JMHamo as per WP:CSD#A7, and was re-created within few hours as a request to return his deleted article (not a place to request WP:REFUND), tagged by me under WP:CSD#G2 criteria. Article has been refunded and few sources has been made available which now actually does mention the subject, but it still does not help the subject to reach WP:BIO or WP:GNG standard. Neither does help Google on my laptop. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 11:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:BIO due to a lack of reliable sources that are not just WP:ROUTINE. JMHamo (talk) 22:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - upon another review, some concerns about BLP violations - especially with weakly sourced stuff. -- Tawker (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.