The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Alabama USA. (non-admin closure) ansh666 23:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peyton Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brown is not notable. She is Miss Georgia USA, but this is not enough to pass notability. In the previous discussion it was claimed 5 of the articles were not related to her beauty pageant crown. Looking at the articles, it seems all are. This is at best passing, one event notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- a WP:PSEUDO BLP on a non-notable individual. State level pageant win is a WP:BIO1E and does not add to subject's notability. Coverage is trivial, WP:ROUTINE or local. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Miss Alabama USA: Non-notable. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 12:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep state titleholder twice, has received media coverage, meets WP:GNG PageantUpdater (talk) 23:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment also interested in why you think the outcome here should be any different than in December at the first nomination? I don't see anything that has changed since then and notability is not temporary PageantUpdater (talk) 15:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The reason we should not follow the December 2015 precedent was actually explained in the nomination. I have no idea why I put Georgia when I knew this was Alabama. I knew one of the papers was from Huntsville, which I know is in Alabama. However the fact is that they were articles related to the pageant. For state pageant winners we should require sources that cover the person without any regard to their winning a state pageant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment why should we require that? Is this something you've made up to fit your point of view or can you point towards something? Because plenty of editors seem to disagree with you. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 03:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• If found to not be independently notable, redirect to Miss Alabama USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete state winner of a beauty pageant, all mentions of her online are in reference to the state-level win; not notable as she didn't win Miss USA and has no other claim to notability besides the Miss Georgia title. CrispyGlover (talk) 03:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply did you read the article or just the incorrect nomination? Because she wasn't/isn't Miss Georgia. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 00:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Miss Alabama USA, there is no source of notability aside from winning state-level beauty pageants.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Miss Alabama USA. State pageant win not enough to establish notability. MB 22:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.