The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I withdraw (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 08:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phander (village) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have tried to clean this up the best I can but a google search find nothing that suggests this small settlement passes the general notability guideline. I would love to be proved wrong. (note: page originally created at Phunder village) Yellow Dingo (talk) 10:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)I withdraw now it has been proven village exists. Yellow Dingo (talk) 08:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 10:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the GNG would not be as solid here since all geographic places especially villages are in fact notable for an article. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister: The thing is, I'm not sure this village even exists. -- Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep some resources can be found at the Phander Lake article, and the village is clearly visible on google maps.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  08:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.