The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phillip DeSimone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Egregious BLP violation, all information comes from court transcripts, making this OR. Corvus cornix 21:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, nothing found in Google News Archive search. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate directory of minor organized crime figures. --Dhartung | Talk 23:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I consider court transcripts a possibly RS depending on what they say, but these are indictments, not convictions. The information in them is unproven, unless further information can be found.
• Delete Calling someone a criminal without evidence that they have been convicted of a crime is an egregious BLP violation. Court transcripts may be a RS that something is true, but they are not a RS that something is notable, or half my high school graduating class would pass WP:BIO. --Charlene 04:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.