The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Philoian[edit]

Philoian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Apparently, the creator of this page does not want it redirected to Philo. This article does not assert any actual usage of the term Philoian in reference to a disciple of Philo, however, so I too believe a redirect would not be very useful. Delete.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Dicdef for a no-notable neologism. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 03:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This isn't even non-notable--besides being burdened by errors and suffering a complete lack of documentation. Drmies (talk)
• Delete. Should have used the sandboxsmfield —Preceding undated comment was added at 12:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
  • Then if you agree that the page you created should be deleted, why not put a speedy deletion request on it, ((db-author))?—Largo Plazo (talk) 13:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.