The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pightley Manor[edit]

Pightley Manor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For similar reasons discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westbury Nernewtes; a former manor that, according to the listed sources (this one in particular) no longer has any extant manorial property. No indications that this particular location or the associated manorial title is in any way notable. Drm310 (talk) 21:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For exactly the same reasons as the other one, a title that doesn't have land is in no way notable, and fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whether or not it currently has land no bearing on its notability. We should be asking, was it ever notable, perhaps in its heyday? --Pontificalibus (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.