The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Piwik PRO[edit]

Piwik PRO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, routine funding news, WP:SPIP and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. The company has raised $2M which strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 07:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 07:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 07:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.