The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pocket World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is written mainly from primary sources. Looking through Google all I could find were about buying copies of the magazine and a YouTube video on the magazine. I don't think the magazine is notable enough for inclusion. RPI2026F1 (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Video games. RPI2026F1 (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 21:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. All my searches of it had no resaults of the newspaper, like the nom said it was people selling the newspaper.`~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 15:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete virtually no coverage, non-notable. The magazine was supposedly established in 2000 and continued publishing until 2015, so it's not as if most of the sources would be on paper and not online, as is often the case with older publications. Mooonswimmer 00:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Moonswimmer. I can't find any third party sourcing and it's not so old that it would all be locked away in hard copy paper sources. Sergecross73 msg me 15:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.